Cases Argued by Advocate Aditya Pratap
Sunil Kumar Chugh vs. Union of India (201415)
Penalty of Rs. 3 Crore imposed on Developer for constructing without Environment Clearance and depriving residents of parking and other areas.
Food in Multiplexes Case
The Bombay High Court directed the Government of Maharashtra to frame a policy to allow cinemagoers to carry their own food inside multiplex. Multiplexes violate the right to life under Article 21 by denying people to carry their own food and instead, force them to purchase junk food at exorbitant prices. The issue of illegal vending and supply of food inside the cinema auditorium is also under consideration.
The Special Judge (Anti-Corruption) rejected the closure report filed by the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Mumbai in the Hiranandani Powai Land Scam and directed further investigation. In another case, FIR was registered against Raheja Builders and Municipal Officers for giving Occupancy Certificate (OC) to a building on the basis of false documents.
Rani Poddar vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (2014-16)
Stayed the illegal demolition of public drinking water fountains being attempted by the MCGM without authority of law. Civil suit filed in City Civil Court, Mumbai to this effect
Raheja Green CHS vs. State of Maharashtra (2014-15)
FIR registered against Mumbai Builder under Section 52 of the MRTP Act, 1966 for construction in violation of approved plans.
Anil Bhatia vs. Shree Shivdham CHS (201415)
Case filed in Cooperative Court against illegal disconnection of water supply – full restoration ordered with compensation for harassment suffered. In addition, criminal prosecution initiated under Section 430 of the IPC.
Gorakhnath Gupta vs. State of Maharashtra (2016-17)
FIR ordered against railway officials for committing forgery by which a suicide case was shown as an accidental death – police investigation reopened.