Cases Argued By Us

Navigating International Jurisdiction: Landmark Case Highlights Procedural Safeguards Under Section 188 Cr.P.C

The case at hand presents a significant legal question regarding the application of Section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), 1973, which governs the prosecution of offenses committed...

Justice for Homebuyers: MahaRERA Cracks Down on Delayed Projects!

In a landmark ruling, the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) addressed a dispute involving a delayed real estate project in Devad, Panvel, initiated in 2013. The Complainant...

Andheri Metropolitan Magistrates Court prominent Mumbai – Based Restaurateur to pay 10% Interim Compensation to Holder of bounced Cheque – Advocate Aditya Pratap represents Complainant Cheque Holder

The Court Metropolitan Magistrate at Andheri directed a prominent Mumbai based Restaurateur to pay 10 per cent (10%) interim compensation to the holder of a bounced cheque under section 143A of the...

Bhoiwada Magistrate Court orders Rs. 40,000/- per month Interim Maintenance to Newly Married Woman under the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 – Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the Wife

The court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Bhoiwada ordered the husband of the newly married woman to pay Rs. 40,000/- per month to her by the way of interim maintenance under Section 23 of the...

Mumbai Sessions Court at Dindoshi grants Anticipatory Bail to Senior Citizen Couple accused in 498A Cruelty FIR – Advocate Aditya Pratap represents the Applicants in the Case

The Court of Sessions at Dindoshi, Mumbai granted Anticipatory Bail to a Mumbai-based senior citizen couple who had been arraigned as Accused in an FIR registered under Section 498A of the Indian...

Court Discharges Accused in Alleged Cheating and Breach of Trust Case – Advocate Aditya Pratap Successfully represented a Businessman falsely accused of Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust

In a significant development at the Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Andheri, Mumbai, the Court discharged a healthcare businessman from criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC...