Cases Argued by Aditya Pratap

This page provides a structured overview of matters argued by Advocate Aditya Pratap across different branches of law. The descriptions below are general in nature and based on publicly available information and broad categories of work undertaken. They are intended solely for informational purposes and do not constitute solicitation or advertising.

Family Law

Section 29 DV Appeal – Mumbai Sessions Court enhances Wife’s Interim Maintenance to Rs. 35,000/- per month – Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the Appellant Wife challenging the Kurla Magistrate Court’s Interim Maintenance Order:

The Court of Sessions at Mumbai, in exercise of its appellate powers under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005, enhanced the quantum of interim maintenance granted to a Mumbai woman from...

Aggrieved by Domestic Violence – Kurla Magistrate Court awards Rs. 25,000/- per month Interim Maintenance to Destitute Wife – Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the Wife:

In a crisp order passed in January, 2021 the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate in Kurla awarded interim maintenance of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) per month to a destitute wife...

Criminal Law

Andheri Court discharges Businessman in Cheating Case registered at Amboli Police Station – Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the Discharge Applicant:

The Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 44th Court at Andheri discharged a businessman in a cheating case registered at Amboli Police Station, Mumbai. Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the...

Environmental Law

NGT Directs MMRDA to Obtain Prior Environmental Clearance for Wadala Truck Terminal

Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the applicant before the NGT, which directed MMRDA to obtain prior Environmental Clearance for the Wadala Notified Area and restrained further land allotments...

Civil and Business Law

Private Loan Default followed by Cheque Bounce – Mumbai City Civil Court at  Dindoshi orders deposit of Rs. 44 Lakh Principal Amount pending final hearing of Commercial Summary Suit – Aditya Pratap represented the Plaintiff:

The Mumbai City Civil Court at Dindoshi directed a prominent Mumbai restaurateur to deposit Rs. 44,46,333/- (Rupees Forty Four Lakhs Forty Six Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Three Only) towards the...